Legal Opinion
Doe v. Sundquist
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Decided August 23, 1996No. 3:96-0599PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM:
JOHN T. NIXON, Chief Judge.
Pending before this Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for a Preliminary Injunction barring Defendants from unsealing and disclosing to any third persons confidential records contained in Plaintiffs’ adoption files, which the State of Tennessee has in its custody. Doc. No. 79. Also pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion to Consolidate the Preliminary Injunction Hearing with a Hearing on the Merits. Doe. No. 71.
The Court finds that Plaintiffs fail to meet the requisite standard of review to support a preliminary injunction, and therefore denies…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Doe v. SundquistTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
- American Traffic Solutions, Inc. v. The City of Knoxville, TennesseeCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2013
- Doe v. SundquistCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
- El Ahkeen v. Tony ParkerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000