Donze v. Devlin
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Dbew,
The appeal is from the refusal to take off a compulsory nonsuit entered at the conclusion of plaintiffs’ evidence. Whether they established a prima facie case, taking the testimony in its most favorable light (Foley v. Wasserman, 319 Pa. 420; Burns v. Pittsburgh, 320 Pa. 92; Deemer v. Weaver, 324 Pa. 85), is the controlling question. If they did the nonsuit must be set aside.
In 1929 the Board of Public Education of the School District of Philadelphia executed a written lease of the Fox Chase School Building, no longer used for school purposes, to Boy Scout Troop No.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Deemer v. Weaver, Exrx.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Burns v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Dinger v. FriedmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Foley, Exr. v. WassermanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Hartman v. Pittsburg Incline Plane Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Harris v. SeiavitchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Solomon v. Neisner Bros.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1950
- Hostetter v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- Fabel, Admr. v. HazlettSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Fedorovich v. GlennSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.