Harris v. Seiavitch
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
The parents of Julius Harris, as his next friends and in their own right, brought these actions of trespass to recover damages for injuries sustained by minor plaintiff through the alleged negligence of defendant. After verdicts for plaintiffs, refusal of defendant’s motions for judgments n. o. v. and a new trial, and the entry of judgments, these appeals followed.
Reviewing the record, as we must, in the light most favorable to plaintiffs and according them the benefit of every reasonable inference to be deduced therefrom (Giannone v. Reale, 338 Pa. 21, 23), it appears that minor…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- McColligan v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
- Commonwealth v. StewartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Corbin v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Donze v. DevlinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Busch v. BientzleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
3Cited by34 opinions
- Edwards v. Hollywood CanteenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- English v. Lehigh County AuthoritySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- John C. Richardson v. Walsh Construction Company, Morrison-Knudsen Company, Inc., Henry J. Kaiser Company and Perini CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1964
- Sun Cab Co. v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1951
- Kiehl v. Action Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.