Legal Opinion

Harris v. Seiavitch

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 28, 1939No. Appeals, 188 and 189PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

The parents of Julius Harris, as his next friends and in their own right, brought these actions of trespass to recover damages for injuries sustained by minor plaintiff through the alleged negligence of defendant. After verdicts for plaintiffs, refusal of defendant’s motions for judgments n. o. v. and a new trial, and the entry of judgments, these appeals followed.

Reviewing the record, as we must, in the light most favorable to plaintiffs and according them the benefit of every reasonable inference to be deduced therefrom (Giannone v. Reale, 338 Pa. 21, 23), it appears that minor…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McColligan v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  2. Commonwealth v. StewartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. Corbin v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  4. Donze v. DevlinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  5. Busch v. BientzleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Edwards v. Hollywood CanteenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. English v. Lehigh County AuthoritySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. John C. Richardson v. Walsh Construction Company, Morrison-Knudsen Company, Inc., Henry J. Kaiser Company and Perini CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1964
  4. Sun Cab Co. v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1951
  5. Kiehl v. Action Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API