Legal Opinion

State v. Bell

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided February 9, 1988No. 4887PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBieluch, J.

The defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction, after a jury trial, of robbery in the third degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-136d and assault of a victim sixty years or older in the third degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-61a.1 2 The *422defendant claims: (1) that the trial court erred by denying his motion to suppress the victim’s out-of-court identification, and in admitting her subsequent in-court identification when such identifications were allegedly unnecessarily suggestive and unreliable; (2) that the prosecutor’s misconduct deprived him of a fair trial…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. State v. EvansSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
  2. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  3. Burch v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. State v. HinckleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  5. State v. MitchellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hurley v. Heart Physicians, P.C.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  2. State v. KellyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
  3. Lattisaw v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  4. State v. IovienoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
  5. State v. ClarkConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API