Legal Opinion
State v. Mitchell
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 23, 1987No. 12977PublishedCited by 92 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShea, J.
The Appellate Court set aside the judgments of the trial court granting the defendants’ motions to exclude pretrial and in-court identifications, to suppress seized property, and to dismiss the information with prejudice in both cases. State v. Mitchell, 7 Conn. App. 46, 507 A.2d 1017 (1986). Having certified this combined appeal, we now conclude that the Appellate Court’s judgment must be reversed with respect to the suppression of the identifications, which will therefore be excluded from evidence during further trial court proceedings in these cases.
Although the underlying facts are set…
2Cases cited78 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by92 opinions
- State v. ColonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- State v. OquendoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- State v. TatumSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- State v. FigueroaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- State v. TrineSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.