Legal Opinion
Morgan v. Federal Aviation Administration
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 25, 2009No. Civil Action No. 2007-1748PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
RICARDO M. URBINA, District Judge.
Granting the Defendants’ Motion for Leave to File an Amended Answer
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter is before the court on the defendants’ motion for leave to file an amended answer. The pro se plaintiff is a former employee of the Federal Aviation Administration (“FAA”), an agency housed within the Department of Transportation (“DOT”). The defendants are the FAA and Susan Marmet, a former coworker of the plaintiff. The plaintiff brought this action under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 201 et seq., and the California Fair…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Myrna O'Dell Firestone v. Leonard K. FirestoneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- John W. Dussouy, Jr. v. Gulf Coast Investment CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Smith v. Washington Post CompanyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Rhodes v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Butler v. SchapiroDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Morgan v. Federal Aviation AdministrationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- B&G Foods North America, Inc. v. EmbryDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.