Legal Opinion

Oppenheim v. Circuit Court of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1982No. Nos. 55461, 55474 consPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Goldenhersh

Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 381 (73 Ill. 2d R. 381) we allowed two motions for leave to file original petitions for writs of prohibition or mandamus or for the exercise of this court’s supervisory authority, and consolidated the actions. In cause No. 55461, Mary G. Oppenheim, liquidating receiver (the receiver), as petitioner, named as respondents the “CIRCUIT COURT OF THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, County of McLean, JAMES KNECHT, One of the Judges of that Court, CHARLOTTE HAMMOND, Prevailing Party.” In cause No. 55474, Charlotte Hammond (Hammond) named as respondents “CIRCUIT COURT OF…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. PSL Realty Co. v. Granite Investment Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1981
  2. People Ex Rel. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. GitchoffIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Zimek v. Illinois National Casualty Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1939
  4. People ex rel. East Side Levee & Sanitary District v. Madison County Levee & Sanitary DistrictIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
  5. People Ex Rel. Kelly, Ketting, Furth, Inc. v. EpsteinIllinois Supreme Court · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Stewart v. EGNEP (Pty) Ltd.District Court, C.D. Illinois · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API