Legal Opinion
Mitchell v. County of Orange
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 4, 1985No. G000352PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SONENSHINE, Acting P. J.
The Mitchells appeal a judgment denying their petition for writ of mandate. They further allege the court erred in refusing to issue a statement of decision.
The Mitchells own property at the intersection of Newport Avenue and Foothill Boulevard in Orange County. It contains a historic ranch house, currently used as a detoxification center, and several other buildings.
In June 1981 the Orange County Board of Supervisors authorized its environmental management agency to prepare the North Tustin Specific Plan (NTSP). The project was undertaken in response to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Yost v. ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- Twain Harte Homeowners Ass'n v. County of TuolumneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Miramar Hotel Corp. v. Frank B. Hall & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1985
- Karlson v. City of CamarilloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Guardians of Turlock's Integrity v. Turlock City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Gorman v. Tassajara Development Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2009
- Endangered Habitats League, Inc. v. County of OrangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Corona-Norco Unified School District v. City of CoronaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- McCormick v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF RIVERSIDE CTY. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.