Legal Opinion

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF RIVERSIDE CTY. v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 22, 1994No. E013090PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TIMLIN, Acting P. J.

The underlying action to which this writ petition relates is a mandamus and a declaratory and injunctive relief proceeding brought by Temecula Ranchos against the County of Riverside (County), in which Temecula Ranchos challenges County’s approval of a residential *834housing project on the basis that County improperly determined that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment and issued a negative declaration to that effect as to the project. The question presented by the petition filed in this court is whether Temecula Ranchos complied with the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. People v. Lance W.California Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Friends of Mammoth v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  5. People v. Eric J.California Supreme Court · 1979

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Gonzales v. Arrow Financial Services, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  2. Committee for Green Foothills v. Santa Clara County Bd. of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Committee for Green Foothills v. Santa Clara County Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Stockton Citizens for Sensible Planning v. City of StocktonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Stephen Slesinger, Inc. v. Walt Disney Co.California Court of Appeal · 2007

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API