Legal Opinion

Reed v. Reed

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 20, 1955No. 36650PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court.

This action was tried on an amended petition alleging the plaintiff purchased the land in controversy from W. B. North. It is alleged that he paid the full consideration for the transfer but that by an error of the scrivener the name of Ruben Reed as grantee was inserted instead of that of J. R. Reed and that this mistake was not discovered until after the death of Ruben Reed. Plaintiff asks that the deed be reformed to correct the mistake and that a resulting trust be declared in his favor.

There is no substantial dispute in…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Archer v. McClureSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  2. Archer v. . McClureSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  3. Crabb v. ChisumSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  4. Fabbro v. ReeseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  5. Whittaker v. WhiteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Meadows v. FainSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  2. Flournoy v. HewgleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
  3. Flournoy v. HewgleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API