Legal Opinion

Sioux Honey Ass'n v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided August 27, 2010No. Slip Op. 10-96; Court 09-00141PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STANCEU, Judge:

Plaintiffs Sioux Honey Association, Adee Honey Farms, Monterey Mushrooms, Inc., The Garlic Company, and Beaucoup Craw-fish, Inc., dba Riceland Crawfish, Inc. (collectively, “plaintiffs”) brought this action against the United States and against a large number of private parties (“Surety Defendants”) engaged in the business of issuing customs bonds. Compl. ¶¶ 1-2. Plaintiffs, domestic producers of honey, mushrooms, garlic, or crawfish, alleged numerous statutory and regulatory violations by the United States Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) and United States Customs…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. O'Shea v. LittletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Heckler v. ChaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Ebay Inc. v. Mercexchange, L. L. C.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sioux Honey Ass'n v. Hartford Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
  2. Furniture Brands International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2011
  3. Pastificio Lucio Garofalo, S.P.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2011
  4. Hartford Fire Insurance Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2017
  5. Ocean Duke Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API