Legal Opinion

Ocean Duke Corp. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided July 18, 2011No. Slip Op. 11-85; Court 11-00140PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION & ORDER

BARZILAY, Senior Judge:

The present dispute between Plaintiff Ocean Duke Corporation (“Ocean Duke”) and Defendant United States concerns five continuous entry bonds subject to enhanced bond requirements that U.S. Customs & Border Protection (“Customs”) once imposed on certain importers. The salient question before the court asks whether the relevant statute of limitations prevents judicial review. Defendant contends that the two year period for Ocean Duke to bring an action has passed and, as a result, 28 U.S.C. § 2636(i) deprives the court of subject matter jurisdiction or…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. Bowles v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Baroque Timber Indus. (Zhongshan) Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API