United States v. Reyes
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The opinion filed on August 18, 2009, 577 F.3d 1069, is amended as follows: on p. 1073, replace the word “reprehensibility” with the word “responsibility”. Also, on p. 1076, replace “The government even displayed for the jury a diagram explaining the prosecutor’s position that the Finance Department did not know of the backdating.” with “The government even displayed for the jury a diagram designating Elizabeth Moore as among the uninformed to explain the prosecutor’s position that the Finance Department did not know of the backdating.”
The petition for rehearing is denied.
No subsequent…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- United States v. RuehleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. GordonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. ToddCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. James LloydCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Quan v. Computer Sciences Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.