C. I. T. Corp. v. W. J. Crosby & Co.
Supreme Court of Virginia
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the CourtEggleston, J.
The question here involved is the relative priority of the lien of a conditional sales contract on a motor vehicle duly recorded under-the laws of the State of Georgia, where the vendee resides, and the lien of an attachment levied on such motor vehicle while it was being operated in Virginia.
The facts are undisputed. On July 9, 1938, W. J. Crosby & Company, Inc., a Virginia corporation, filed in the court below a petition for attachment against O. L. Williams, a resident of Georgia, seeking to recover the sum of $1,125.50 admittedly due. On July 19th the attachment was levied on a 1938 Ford…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hess v. PawloskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Hendrick v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Kane v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- C. I. T. Corp. v. GuySupreme Court of Virginia · 1938
- Pawloski v. HessMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp. v. KaplanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1956
- In Re SmithDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1970
- In re SmithDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1966
- Joyner v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1951
- Davis v. SheriffDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1951
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.