Legal Opinion

McPadden v. Morris

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 5, 1940PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

For the reasons stated in the memorandum of decision, quoted above, we find correct the conclusion reached, that the plaintiff was not “the surviving spouse of such member who shall have been married to him and living with him as his wife at the time of his death,” within the meaning of the charter provision. As stated by the trial court, there is no room for construction when the wording of the statute is clear and direct.

The brief of the plaintiff is, in the main, concerned with the claimed inequitable result of this application of the statute. She points out that while she was living apart…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. NelsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
  2. Connelly v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
  3. Wilcox v. BlissSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  4. State Ex Rel. Lewis v. TurneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
  5. Blodgett v. New Britain Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Kirby v. Board of Fire CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
  2. Hutchison v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
  3. McNichols v. Police Protective Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado · 1949
  4. Gonsalves v. City of West HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  5. Doran v. RuggConnecticut Superior Court · 1960

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API