Legal Opinion
St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co. v. Prince
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 18, 1930No. 19699PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DIFFENDAFFER, C.
This Is an action for damages for personal injuries alleged to have been received on October 10, 1027. Defendant in error, hereinafter referred to •as plaintiff, who was then past 17 years of age, was engaged by his uncle, Roy Elrod, in the exhibition of a picture in certain cities in Oklahoma. The younger brother was working with him. His uncle resided in Cushing, Okla., and on or about October 8, 1927, he directed plaintiff to go to Henry-etta, Okla., for the purpose of exhibiting the picture, and on October 10th, he called the plaintiff over the telephone and directed the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. IvesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Central Passenger Railway Co. v. KuhnCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1888
- Hines v. DeanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. RundellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Missouri, K. & T. R. Co. v. StantonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Lindquist v. Des Moines Union Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1947
- Walker v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Strom v. Des Moines & Central Iowa Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1957
- Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. RichersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. NailSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.