Legal Opinion

Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. Richerson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 26, 1939No. 27805PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.

This is an action for the recovery of damages for injuries to plaintiff’s person and his automobile, occurring when he drove said auto into the side of a train of empty freight ears of the defendant railroad company at one of the latter’s track crossings on Oklahoma State Highway No. 81, a short distance north of the city of El Reno, Okla.

The plaintiff alleged in his petition that the injuries occurred at about 3 o’clock a. m., while he was lawfully driving his car upon said highway and that they were the result of two or more boxcars being suddenly pushed or switched upon said highway…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. IvesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. People v. . O'SullivanNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  3. Jones v. East Tennessee, Virginia & Georgia RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  4. Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad v. VoelkerIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Kaufman v. BoismierSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Butane Corporation v. KirbyArizona Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Co. v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  3. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. TemplarSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  4. Garrison v. BonhamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  5. Cain v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railroad CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API