Legal Opinion

Walker v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 14, 1982No. 54430, 54491PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMMS, Justice:

This consolidated appeal arose from a negligence action brought by Wenoka K. Walker against the St. Louis-San Francisco Railway and L. E. Brewer after her car and a train collided at a grade crossing, resulting in personal injuries. The crossing in question was not equipped with any special warning devices other than a crossbuck sign. Richard Walker, plaintiff’s husband, brought a derivative action for loss of society, companionship, and consortium. The railway company and Brewer denied negligence and alleged contributory negligence because of intoxication, failure to observe…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. RundellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  2. Wooten v. HallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
  3. Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Co. v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  4. St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co. v. PrinceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  5. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Ry. Co. v. FlowersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Myers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
  2. Bane v. Anderson, Bryant & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  3. Silk v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  4. Middlebrook v. Imler, Tenny & Kugler, M.D.'s, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  5. McCoy v. Oklahoma Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API