Legal Opinion
Orient Handel v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 11, 1987No. B007459PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McCLOSKY, J.
Orient Handel, a corporation, and Nassir Shokrian and Lotfollah Shokrian, as individuals and former partners in a partnership that operated a rug retailing business known as Orient Handel (appellants) appeal from the judgment rendered against them and in favor of United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company (respondent or USF & G) for insurance fraud.
The judgment was entered on special verdicts after a jury trial on Orient Handel’s complaint for breach of the duty of good faith and fair dealing, breach of contract, fraud, violation of Insurance Code section 790.03, and…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
- Commercial Union Assurance Companies v. Safeway Stores, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1980
- Hilliard v. A. H. Robins Co.California Court of Appeal · 1983
- Fish v. Los Angeles Dodgers Baseball ClubCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- California Casualty General Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- ELSENBERG v. Alameda Newspapers, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1999
- People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Okun v. MortonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Petersen v. Allstate Indemnity Co.District Court, C.D. California · 2012
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.