Legal Opinion

People v. Williams

California Supreme Court

Decided August 21, 2003No. S107266PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BAXTER, J.

In Kansas v. Crane (2002) 534 U.S. 407 [151 L.Ed.2d 856, 122 S.Ct. 867], the United States Supreme Court held that the safeguards of personal liberty embodied in the due process guaranty of the federal Constitution prohibit the involuntary confinement of persons on the basis that they are dangerously disordered without “proof [that they have] serious difficulty in controlling [their dangerous] behavior.” (Id. at p. 413.) California’s Sexually Violent Predators Act (SVPA or Act; Welf. & Inst. Code, § 6600 et seq.)1 does not use that precise language in defining who is eligible…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Yates v. EvattSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Kansas v. CraneSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Cooley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Hubbart v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. People v. McKeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Van Grinsven v. G.R.H.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Moore v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  4. McGee v. BartowCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  5. People v. Howard N.California Supreme Court · 2005

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API