Legal Opinion

Lindelli v. Town of San Anselmo

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 3, 2003No. A101076PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GEMELLO, J.

Elections Code section 9241 provides that when an ordinance is the subject of a referendum petition, it shall not take effect until the majority of the voters voting on the referendum approve the ordinance. A municipality may not evade this stay provision by re-passing a materially identical ordinance as an interim measure until the referendum election.

In this case, respondent Town of San Anselmo awarded a waste management franchise to a new provider, respondent Marin Sanitary Service, in place of the incumbent, appellant North Bay Corporation. After opponents of the new…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Associated Home Builders of Greater Eastbay, Inc. v. City of LivermoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Blair v. PitchessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. In Re William M.California Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Westlake Community Hospital v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Parker v. BowronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State Water Resources Control Board CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  2. City of Oakland v. Oakland Police & Fire Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  3. In Re Groundwater CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  4. Secretary of State v. STATE LEGISLATURENevada Supreme Court · 2004
  5. County of Kern v. T.C.E.F., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2016

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API