Legal Opinion
Frieburg Farm Equipment, Inc. v. Van Dale, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
Decided February 15, 1991No. 89-C-0666-CPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
CRABB, Chief Judge.
This case is before the court following a trial and jury verdict in plaintiffs’ favor. The jury found that defendant Van Dale had breached an agreement with Frieburg by appointing additional dealers in a two-county territory and that Van Dale violated the Wisconsin Fair Dealership Law by terminating Frieburg’s dealership.
Now pending are Van Dale’s motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 50, or in the alternative, for a new trial, pursuant to Fed.R. Civ.P. 59, on both liability claims and for a new trial on the damages…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Rabidue v. Osceola Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Maxine Smith v. Charles Rowe, John Platt, Frank Deere, Charlotte Nesbitt, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Andrew W. Hansard, Cross-Appellant v. Pepsi-Cola Metropolitan Bottling Co., Inc., D/B/A Pepsi-Cola Bottling Group, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- Sumnicht v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
- 41 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1789, 41 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 36,492 John W. McNeil Cross-Appellant v. Economics Laboratory, Inc., Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Frieburg Farm Equipment, Inc. v. Van Dale, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Reich v. MinnicusDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1993
- Doucas Volkswagen, Inc. v. Volkswagen of America, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1995
- Frieburg Farm Equipment, Inc. v. Van Dale, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992