Legal Opinion
Andrew W. Hansard, Cross-Appellant v. Pepsi-Cola Metropolitan Bottling Co., Inc., D/B/A Pepsi-Cola Bottling Group, Cross-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided February 21, 1989No. 87-1717PublishedCited by 150 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SNEED, Circuit Judge:
Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co., Inc. (Pepsi) was held liable for violating the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) by discharging and later refusing to rehire Andrew Hansard. Pepsi appeals the jury’s verdict on liability and damages. We affirm the district court’s judgment on the merits, but we reverse and remand the award of damages. Hansard cross-appeals the district court’s refusal to award liquidated damages and prejudgment interest. We affirm the district court’s refusal to award liquidated damages, but reverse its refusal to award prejudgment interest. The…
2Cases cited62 opinions
- The Boeing Company v. Daniel C. ShipmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. ThurstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Henry W. BIENKOWSKI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- Rodriguez v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Rodgers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by150 opinions
- Russell v. McKinney Hosp. VentureCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- Kirsch v. Fleet Street, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Giles v. General Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- MacHinchick v. PB Power, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
- Duke v. Uniroyal Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
145 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.