Legal Opinion

Frieburg Farm Equipment, Inc. v. Van Dale, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided October 29, 1992No. 91-1510Published

1Opinion of the Court

FLAUM, Circuit Judge.

Frieburg Farm Equipment, Inc., and related parties (collectively “Frieburg”) brought this diversity suit against Van Dale, Inc., under the Wisconsin Fair Dealership Law (WFDL) and state common law. The district court, on cross motions for summary judgment, held that Frieburg met the statutory definition of “dealer,” and hence could proceed with its WFDL count. At the same time, the court granted Van Dale summary judgment on all other counts, save one for breach of contract. Frieburg Farm Equip., Inc. v. Van Dale, Inc., No. 89-C-0666-C (W.D.Wis. Sept. 6, 1990) (“Frieburg…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Ziegler Co., Inc. v. Rexnord, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Bush v. National School Studios, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Walgreen Company v. Sara Creek Property Company, B v. A/K/A Sara Creek Beta, and Phar-Mor CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  4. United States v. Rural Electric Convenience Cooperative Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  5. Ralph Remus and Ralph's Standard, Inc., Individually and on Behalf of a Class of Persons Similarly Situated v. Amoco Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API