Legal Opinion

Taito v. Owens Corning

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 22, 1992No. B059618PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WOODS (Fred), J.

Plaintiff/employee filed a complaint against a third party for injuries sustained while in the course and scope of his employment. The workers’ compensation carrier for plaintiff’s employer later filed a complaint in intervention in plaintiff’s third party action. Plaintiff was subsequently permitted to file a complaint in intervention in his own third party action, but the court later struck plaintiff’s complaint in intervention. Plaintiff appeals from the order striking his complaint in intervention in his own third party action. We affirm.

Factual and Procedural…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Austin v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Timberidge Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Santa RosaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  3. Scherer v. MarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  4. Buell v. CBS, INC.California Court of Appeal · 1982
  5. Chambers v. Santa Cruz City School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. BMC West Corp. v. Town Center Courtyard CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2020
  2. Kivenson v. U.S. Trust Corp. N.A.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API