Martin v. U-Haul Co. of Fresno
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BEST, Acting P. J.
Plaintiff, T. L. Martin (Martin), appeals from a judgment of nonsuit in favor of the defendant, U-Haul Company of Fresno (U-Haul), on two causes of action and from a conditional order granting new trial on the third cause of action on which Martin was successful at trial. We reject Martin’s contentions on appeal and affirm in all respects.
Statement of the Case
Jury trial began on June 9, 1986, in Martin’s action arising out of U-Haul’s termination of a dealership contract. At the close of Martin’s case, the court granted U-Haul’s motions for nonsuit as to the first…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Comunale v. Traders & General InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Crisci v. Security InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Neal v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Seaman's Direct Buying Service, Inc. v. Standard Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1984
- Cleary v. American Airlines, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1980
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Careau & Co. v. Security Pacific Business Credit, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1990
- Cates Construction, Inc. v. Talbot PartnersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Air-Sea Forwarders, Inc. v. Air Asia Company, Ltd., and E-Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Price v. Wells Fargo BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Harris v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Court of Appeal · 1993
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.