Legal Opinion
Kovalesky v. A.M.C. Associated Merchandising Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 24, 1982No. 82 Civ. 5802 (DNE)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
EDELSTEIN, District Judge:
The plaintiff in this case was an employee of the defendant. The defendant fired her, and she now claims damages for tortious conduct, breach of contract and violation of statutes in the wage the defendant paid her while she was employed and in the defendant’s action in discharging her. Jurisdiction arises under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1343. The defendant has moved pursuant to F.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(5) and 12(b)(6) to dismiss the complaint for insufficiency of service of process and in the alternative to dismiss various aspects of the plaintiff’s claim.
FACTS
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Gunvant D. SHAH, Appellant, v. MT. ZION HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER, a Non-Profit Corporation, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Parker v. BorockNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
- Mr. And Mrs. A. T. Stanga v. McCormick Shipping CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
- Frederick PFEIFFER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ESSEX WIRE CORP., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- Guyette v. Stauffer Chemical Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1981
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Fariss v. Lynchburg FoundryCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
- Payne v. RozendaalSupreme Court of Vermont · 1986
- Danny v. Laidlaw Transit Services, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2008
- ARCO Alaska, Inc. v. AkersAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
- Danny v. Laidlaw Transit Services, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.