Legal Opinion
Parker v. Borock
New York Court of Appeals
Decided January 15, 1959PublishedCited by 98 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBurke, J.
Prior to receivership, the Yoges Manufacturing Company entered into a collective bargaining agreement with Local 15 of the International Association of Machinists. The defendant receiver, after appointment to that office, was authorized by the Federal District Court to adopt the terms of this agreement.
Subsequently, on April 16, 1954, the plaintiff employee, Parker, á member of the union, was laid off by the receiver, and about four weeks later discharged “ for cause ”. Parker, contending that the discharge was not justified, invoked the grievance procedure outlined in the collective…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Watson v. . GuginoNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Marranzano v. Riggs Nat. Bank of Washington, D.C.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
- Hudak v. Hornell Industries, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1952
- Donato v. American Locomotive Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
- Triboro Coach Corp. v. New York State Labor Relations BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by98 opinions
- Murphy v. American Home Products Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Quinn v. Syracuse Model Neighborhood Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Olga Zdanok v. The Glidden Company, Durkee Famous Foods Division, Frank T. Alexander v. The Glidden Company, Durkee Famous Foods DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
- Weiner v. McGraw-Hill, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
- The Procter & Gamble Independent Union of Port Ivory, N.Y. v. The Procter & Gamble Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.