Legal Opinion
Guyette v. Stauffer Chemical Co.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided July 23, 1981No. Civ. A. 81-245PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DEBEVOISE, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, Margaret Guyette and Mary Mammano, bring this action pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq., against their former employer, Stauffer Chemical Company (Stauffer), and four Stauffer employees, Art Arena, William Christie, Howard Cooper and Ken Meszaros, for alleged discrimination in employment on the basis of sex. In addition to their Title VII claims, plaintiffs bring the pendent state law claims of assault and battery, intentional infliction of emotional distress, negligent infliction of emotional…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Hagans v. LavineSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Moor v. County of AlamedaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Barbara J. HENSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF DUNDEE, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- Fernando C. HARVEY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Thorne BLAKE, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Ford v. Revlon, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1987
- Margaret Daly-Murphy v. Michael Winston, E. Carmack Holmes, Arthur S. Kling, Ronald L. Nelson and the Veterans AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Crawford v. West Jersey Health SystemsDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1994
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.