Legal Opinion

Saylor v. Gray

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1933No. Civil No. 3330PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROSS, C. J.-

The plaintiff Gray and the defendant Saylor were rival candidates for the office of governor of council district No. 8 of the Salt River Valley Water Users’ Association at the general election held by said association on April 5, 1932. The election board, to wit, the board of governors of said association, canvassed the returns, declared Saylor elected, and ordered its clerk to issue to him a certificate of election, after which he duly qualified and assumed the duties of the office. The complaint is in the nature of a common-law action of quo warranto as modified by statute.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Orme v. Salt River Valley Water Users' Ass'nArizona Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Slosser v. Salt River Valley Canal Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District v. PetrieIdaho Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Citrus Growers' Development Ass'n v. Salt River Valley Water Users' Ass'nArizona Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Bethune v. Salt River Valley Water Users' Ass'nArizona Supreme Court · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Application of Frenchman Valley Irrigation Dist.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Hanks v. BorelliCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
  3. Pueblo ex rel. Sancho Bonet v. Russell & Co., S. en C.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1940
  4. Middle Rio Grande Water Users Ass'n v. Middle Rio Grande Conservancy Dist.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1953
  5. People v. Russell & Co., (S. en C.)Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API