Legal Opinion

Bristol v. Board of County Commissioners

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided February 26, 2002No. 00-1053PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1152EBEL, Circuit Judge.

This appeal involves several issues arising under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101-12213. Specifically, we hold, first, that in a case tried to a jury, the court decides whether the plaintiff has identified “impairments” and “major life activities” recognized under the ADA, but that the jury decides whether the plaintiff has demonstrated by a preponderance of the evidence whether the identified impairment “substantially limits” one or more of the identified major life activities such that the plaintiff should be considered “disabled” for…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Bragdon v. AbbottSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. MacKenzie v. City & County of DenverCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  2. Sizova v. National Institute of Standards & TechnologyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
  3. Colgan v. Leatherman Tool Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
  4. Doebele v. Sprint/United Management Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
  5. Hallahan v. the Courier JournalCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2004

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API