Legal Opinion

Harbridge Et Ux. v. Mut. Fire Ins. Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 26, 1942No. Appeals, 216 and 217PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hirt, J.,

Plaintiffs’ dwelling house in DuBois together with their household furniture was insured against fire loss by defendant Mutual Company. The policy of defendant Ben Franklin Company covered the furniture alone. In the early evening of August 21, 1940, a fire of unknown origin occurred in the cellar of the house, accompanied by an explosion. There was little damage from fire; more serious damage resulted from the force of the explosion. The cases were tried together. The jury found that' plaintiff s’ total loss was $1,000. The proportionate amounts assessed against the two…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Neely v. Provident Life & Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Curran v. National Life Insurance Co. of the United StatesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  3. Murphy & Co. v. Manufacturers' Casualty Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  4. Orcutt v. Erie Indemnity Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  5. Francis v. Prudential InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Armon v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  2. NATIONWIDE MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY v. TuftsCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  3. Coleman v. Pittsburgh Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  4. Jones v. Commonwealth Mut. Fire Ins.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1950
  5. American National Fire Insurance v. LapidusCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API