Legal Opinion

Xaphes v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.

District Court, D. Maine

Decided June 14, 1984No. Civ. No. 80-0132 PPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

GENE CARTER, District Judge.

I. Procedural Background

This Memorandum and Order resolves a series of issues raised in motions filed herein in the course of ongoing discovery.

On July 1, 1983, Plaintiff John Xaphes filed a motion in this Court for a default judgment against Defendant Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. (Merrill Lynch) or, in the alternative, for sanctions *547pursuant to Rule 37 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. An evidentiary hearing was held on January 9 and 10, 1984. On January 20, 1984, Merrill Lynch filed a motion requesting this Court to take…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Nye v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Southern Railway Company v. Carl Talmadge LanhamCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  5. Commonwealth of Puerto Rico v. The Ss Zoe Colocotroni, Her Engines, Appurtenances, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Work v. BierDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1985
  2. Morgan v. HatchDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1987
  3. Kearns v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1987
  4. Indiana Coal Council v. HodelDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1988
  5. Sunbeam Corp. v. Black & Decker (U.S.) Inc.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API