Legal Opinion

Kearns v. Ford Motor Co.

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided February 3, 1987No. Civ. A. Nos. 78-70740, 78-70642 and 79-74451PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER IMPOSING SANCTIONS AND PERMITTING WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL

PHILIP PRATT, Chief Judge.

This is the lead case in a series of patent infringement suits filed by Dr. Kearns *58against various automakers and DiamlerBenz, and Porsche. S.W.F., a German auto components supplier, filed a patent declaratory judgment suit in Maryland against Dr. Kearns. After an extensive jurisdictional delay, the court in Maryland transferred venue of the SWF case to this court. These cases have been consolidated for pretrial purposes.

This is a patent case of unusual dimensions. It involves a man…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales, S. A. v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Eash v. Riggins Trucking Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Harris v. MarshDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1987
  2. Adams v. Shell Oil Co.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1992
  3. Speckman v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1997
  4. Naked City, Inc. v. AregoodDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API