Legal Opinion
Sunoco, Inc. (R & M) v. Toledo Edison Co.
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided June 9, 2011No. 2009-0880PublishedCited by 131 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcGee Brown, J.
Introduction
{¶ 1} Sunoco, Inc. (R & M) owns and operates petroleum-refining facilities in several states, including Oregon, Ohio. Sunoco purchases electric service for its Oregon facility from the Toledo Edison Company, intervening appellee.
{¶ 2} This case involves a contract between Sunoco and Toledo Edison for the sale of electricity. The contract is a “special contract,” approved by appellee Public Utilities Commission of Ohio (“PUCO” or “commission”) pursuant to R.C. 4905.31, which permits “reasonable arrangement^]” between public utilities and their customers. Generally, such contracts…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Alexander v. Buckeye Pipe Line Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
- Westfield Insurance v. GalatisOhio Supreme Court · 2003
- Aultman Hospital Ass'n v. Community Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- Shifrin v. Forest City Enterprises, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
- Foster Wheeler Enviresponse, Inc. v. Franklin County Convention Facilities AuthorityOhio Supreme Court · 1997
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by131 opinions
- Laskaris v. Fifth Third Bank (In Re Fifth Third Early Access Cash Advance Litig.)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
- William Eastham v. Chesapeake Appalachia, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- Hall v. Edgewood Partners Insurance Center, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
- Transtar Elec., Inc. v. A.E.M. Elec. Servs. Corp. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
- Dakota Girls, LLC v. Philadelphia Indemnity Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
126 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.