Froines v. Valdez Fisheries Development Ass'n
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRYNER, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Chris Froines sued the Valdez Fisheries Development Association for breaching an agreement to renew an annually issued vessel charter contract making him a member of the association's fishing fleet. The superior court entered summary judgment against Froines, ruling that the parol evidence rule barred him from using extrinsic evidence to prove that the association had promised to renew his charter contract, which, by its own terms, expired at the end of the fishing season in which it was issued. Froines appeals, contending that evidence of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. O'KELLEYAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
- Kupka v. MoreyAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
- Alaska Northern Development, Inc. v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1983
- Alaska Diversified Contractors, Inc. v. Lower Kuskokwim School DistrictAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
- Neal & Co. v. Association of Village Council Presidents Regional Housing AuthorityAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Valdez Fisheries Development Ass'n v. FroinesAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
- Nautilus Marine Enterprises, Inc. v. Exxon Mobil CorporationAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
- Fuller v. City of HomerAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
- Zamarello v. RegesAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
- 3-D & Co. v. Tew's Excavating, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2011
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.