Legal Opinion

Fuller v. City of Homer

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 2005No. S-11105PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EASTAUGH, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

When Abigail Fuller asked to see City of Homer documents concerning a disputed annexation proposal, the city required her to pay a fee for a “search” that included the city manager’s privilege review of the documents. Fuller filed an action for declaratory and injunctive relief, contending that she could not be charged for the privilege review. The superior court rejected her contention and granted summary judgment to the city. We conclude that the statute and code provisions authorizing assessment of a search fee did not permit the city to charge for…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Local 3, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
  2. Brandon v. Corrections Corp. of AmericaAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Peterson v. EkAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Demoski v. NewAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Jones v. JenningsAlaska Supreme Court · 1990

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. DeNardo v. BaxAlaska Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Denardo v. CutlerAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Miller v. CloughAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Watega v. WategaAlaska Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Wolff v. CunninghamAlaska Supreme Court · 2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API