Legal Opinion

Bae v. Shalala

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided January 4, 1995No. 94-1373PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COFFEY, Circuit Judge.

Petitioner Kun Chae Bae, the former president of a generic drag manufacturing company, appeals the final order of the Food and Drag Administration (“FDA”) under the Generic Drag Enforcement Act of 1992 (“GDEA”), 21 U.S.C. §§ 335a-335c, permanently debarring him from “providing services in any capacity to a person that has an approved or pending drag product application.” The GDEA mandates permanent debarment for any individual “convicted of a felony under [fjederal law for conduct ... relating to the development or approval, ... or ... [other] regulation of any drag prod*491u…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Doe v. PoritzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  2. United States v. Robert S. StollerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  3. United States v. LeachCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  4. State v. HansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  5. Doe v. PatakiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API