Legal Opinion
Doe v. Pataki
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 24, 1996No. 96 Civ. 1657 (DC)PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CHIN, District Judge.
In this case, plaintiffs challenge the constitutionality of the New York State Sex Offender Registration Act, N.Y.Correetion Law §§ 168 to 168-v (McKinney Supp.1996) (the “Act”), as applied to individuals who committed their crimes before the Act took effect. I issued a preliminary injunction on March 21, 1996 enjoining retroactive application of the “public notification” provisions of the Act. Doe v. Pataki, 919 F.Supp. 691 (S.D.N.Y.1996). The parties have now filed cross-motions for summary judgment.
The principal issue presented is whether the Act increases the…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Trop v. DullesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Nos. 96-5132, 96-5416Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Doe v. PatakiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- State Ex Rel. Olivieri v. StateSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2001
- Doe v. PatakiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Doe v. PatakiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.