Legal Opinion
United States v. Abdurahman M. Alamoudi
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided June 26, 2006No. 05-4359PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by published opinion. Judge MOTZ wrote the opinion, in which Judge NIEMEYER and Senior Judge HAMILTON joined.
MOTZ, Circuit Judge.
This case concerns the extent of the Government’s authority to seek forfeiture of substitute assets following the entry of a plea agreement and a consent order of forfeiture. Abdurahman Muhammed Alamoudi appeals the district court’s grant of the Government’s motion for forfeiture of substitute assets. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.
I
On July 30, 2004, Alamoudi entered into a plea agreement with the United States in which he agreed to plead guilty to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Libretti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United States v. LeahyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- In Re William Bruce ArnettCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
- United States v. McHanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- United States v. GordonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Roger Day, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Mark PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Terry B. Young v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- United States v. $1,071,251.44 of Funds Associated With Mingzheng Int'l Trading Ltd.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.