Legal Opinion
Terry B. Young v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided June 14, 2007No. 06-2591PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Per curiam
More than five years after he was convicted for his role in a drug ring, Terry Young moved for the return of funds that he says were “taken” by the district court as part of a defective criminal forfeiture. Young cited Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 41 as the basis for this motion, which the district court denied because Young had made the same argument in a prior, unsuccessful motion. Young appealed. We inadvertently issued a final order in this case before Young’s reply brief was due, and then vacated that order to consider Young’s reply. We again find, however, that the district court…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United States v. Yeje-CabreraCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Bahman Mansoori, Mark Cox, Mohammad Mansoori, Kenneth Choice, and Terry YoungCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Michael Gilbert, Karen Gilbert, Michael Gilbert Family Irrevocable Trust, Third Party Claimants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- United States v. LoeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. MosaviCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- United States v. Thaddeus BaniaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
- United States v. De La MataCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
- United States v. QuinteroCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Nestor Sandoval RocaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Roger KochCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.