Legal Opinion

Matson v. Bradbury

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1932No. Civil No. 3154PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.

Ed Bradbury, as plaintiff, brought this action against John C. Matson, doing business as L. A. & Phoenix Express, as defendant, to recover damages for the breach of a contract of hire.

On January 9, 1930, by an agreement reciting that defendant was engaged in a general freight, express, and baggage business between Phoenix, Arizona, and Los Angeles, California, the parties bound themselves as follows: The defendant, to lease of plaintiff one 6-7 ton Stewart truck chassis No. 27X108 and trailer, and to employ, him in the transportation of freight, express, and baggage between Los Angeles and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Alabama & Vicksburg Ry. Co. v. DavisMississippi Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. RucklesSupreme Court of Florida · 1922
  3. Harrington v. Butte, Anaconda & Pacific Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Klock Produce Co. v. Diamond Ice & Storage Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Fleming v. SmouseWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Jacob v. MinerArizona Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Madrigal v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1949
  3. State Ex Rel. Herman v. Tucson Title InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Crouch v. PixlerArizona Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Harris Cattle Co. v. Paradise Motors, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1968

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API