Legal Opinion
Rota-Carb Corp. v. Frye Manufacturing Co.
District Court, S.D. Iowa
Decided July 18, 1961No. Civ. A. 3-835PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VAN PELT, Judge.
This is an action to enjoin infringement of a patent, Exhibit 1, issued February 12, 1957 to Bernard Harmon. Thereafter it was assigned by Harmon, to plaintiff corporation. No question is-raised by defendant as to the sufficiency of this assignment and the court will therefore consider that the proper parties plaintiff and defendant are before-the court. The court finds that there is-diversity of citizenship and that the court has jurisdiction of this case under-Title 28 U.S.C.A. 1338(a).
It was agreed at the pretrial conference that the issues were
a) the validity of the Harmon…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Application of BisleyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952
- In Re FridolphCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1943
- Robert E. Caldwell, an Individual, and Caldwell Manufacturing Company, a Corporation v. Kirk Manufacturing Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1959
- In re DelanceyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1949
- Application of Bernard HarmonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- L. S. Donaldson Company and G. Barr and Company v. La Maur, Inc., La Maur, Inc. v. G. Barr and CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
- Rota-Carb Corporation, a New York Corporation, and Bernard Harmon v. Frye Manufacturing Company, an Iowa CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1963