Ecklund v. Fuisz Technology, Ltd.
District Court, E.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BRINKEMA, District Judge.
Before the Court is defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, in which they argue that same sex harassment in the work place cannot be remedied under federal civil rights law, specifically Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e. Because the Title VII claim is the only federal cause of action in plaintiffs lawsuit, defendants further argue that the Court should decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining counts of plaintiffs complaint which allege constructive discharge, intentional infliction of emotional…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Elizabeth M. Paroline v. Unisys Corporation Edgar L. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
- Bowman v. State Bank of KeysvilleSupreme Court of Virginia · 1985
- Elizabeth M. PAROLINE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNISYS CORPORATION; Edgar L. Moore, Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Williams v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1996
- Fredette v. BVP Management AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
- Michael v. Sentara Health SystemDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1996
- Dixon v. Denny's Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1996
- Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.