Legal Opinion

United States v. Hollis

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided August 26, 1983No. ACM 23820PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

HEMINGWAY, Senior Judge:

The accused was charged with attempting to rape Airman Basic K.E.P., “in conjunction with Airman First Class Vernon D. Fields,” near Denver, Colorado. By appropriate exceptions and substitutions, the court found the accused not guilty of attempted rape but guilty of indecent assault by forcefully and without her consent pulling off the victim’s pants and underpants, “in conjunction with Airman First Class Vernon D. Fields.” The accused’s adjudged sentence extended to a bad conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for fifteen months, total forfeitures and…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. LockwoodUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  2. United States v. LampaniUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  3. United States v. GarciaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  4. United States v. LampaniU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1981
  5. United States v. BowldenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. ShorteU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1984
  2. United States v. GriffinU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API