United States v. Bowlden
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION and ORDER
HEMINGWAY, Senior Judge:
The petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus to compel the respondent to reinstate an attempted rape specification which the respondent dismissed for lack of sufficient service connection to establish subject-matter jurisdiction.
At trial, the parties stipulated to the facts which formed the basis for the jurisdictional ruling and the respondent entered findings of fact after consideration of that stipulation and oral argument.*
If this case were before us on appeal following a finding of guilt at trial, we may well have found a basis for the exercise of…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Dettinger v. United StatesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
- Stein v. CollinsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
- United States v. LabellaU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1982
- United States v. PereiraU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1982
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. MahoneyU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1992
- United States v. MahoneyU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1987
- Porter v. EggersU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1990
- Evans v. KilroyU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1991
- United States v. HollisUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.