Legal Opinion

United States v. Bowlden

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided March 25, 1983No. Miscellaneous Docket No. 83-1PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION and ORDER

HEMINGWAY, Senior Judge:

The petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus to compel the respondent to reinstate an attempted rape specification which the respondent dismissed for lack of sufficient service connection to establish subject-matter jurisdiction.

At trial, the parties stipulated to the facts which formed the basis for the jurisdictional ruling and the respondent entered findings of fact after consideration of that stipulation and oral argument.*

If this case were before us on appeal following a finding of guilt at trial, we may well have found a basis for the exercise of…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dettinger v. United StatesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
  2. Stein v. CollinsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
  3. United States v. LabellaU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1982
  4. United States v. PereiraU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1982

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. MahoneyU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1992
  2. United States v. MahoneyU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1987
  3. Porter v. EggersU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1990
  4. Evans v. KilroyU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1991
  5. United States v. HollisUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API