United States v. Lampani
U S Air Force Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
MILES, Judge:
In this case, we affirm despite defense claims that the court-martial lacked jurisdiction because the offenses of which the accused was ultimately convicted occurred mostly off base.
*633The accused was originally charged with conspiracy and larceny in violation of Articles 81 and 121, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 881, 921. One week later, he was additionally charged with being an accessory after the fact to larceny and receiving stolen property, violations of Articles 78 and 134, Code, 10 U.S.C. §§ 878, 934, supra. As recognized at trial, the two sets of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Schlesinger v. CouncilmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Relford v. Commandant, US Disciplinary Barracks, Fort LeavenworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. TrottierUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980
- United States v. HedlundUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
- United States v. TuckerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. LampaniUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
- United States v. BrauchlerU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1983
- United States v. BraceU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1981
- United States v. LoweryU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1982
- United States v. HardenU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.