Legal Opinion

Morse v. Palatine Insurance

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1961PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLouis L. Friedman, J.

Plaintiffs move for an order granting them an extra allowance in the sum of $2,000, pursuant to section 1513 of the Civil Practice Act, on the ground that this was a difficult and extraordinary case. Defendants oppose the motion, contending that plaintiffs are not entitled to the requested relief.

The action was brought on 10 policies of fire and lightning insurance, and after a trial of seven days, in addition to one day for summation, charge and jury deliberation, plaintiffs received a verdict of $48,801. Their entire claim was for $115,000, and it is thus apparent that the major portion of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Matter of BakerNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  2. Ciufo v. CiufoNew York Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Southwestern Shipping Corp. v. National City BankNew York Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Cohen v. EliasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Yalango v. PoppNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. In re LaFave, Wein & Frament, PLLCNew York Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Yalango v. PoppNew York Court of Appeals · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API