Legal Opinion

DiTomasso v. Loverro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 5, 1937PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLazansky, P. J.

Representative action by a stockholder and director and voting trustee of Paramount Ice Corporation (called “ Paramoimt ”) against all of its other directors, stockholders and voting trustees, except one, and against Samuel Rubel, Rubel Corporation and one Pagano (the last three being here called “ Rubel ”), for a judgment restraining defendants from making a certain contract between Paramount and the Rubel Corporation, and to account for all moneys and property and damages belonging to Paramount, and that the defendants pay such damages.

The contract was dated March 30,1933. Before it was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Arnot v. . Pittston and Elmira Coal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1877
  2. Merry Realty Co. v. Shamokin & Hollis Real Estate Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
  3. Schley v. . AndrewsNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  4. Alexander v. . DonohoeNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  5. Tench v. LawsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Liken v. ShafferDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1946
  2. Norte & Company v. HuffinesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968
  3. In re El Paso Pipeline Partners, L.P. Derivative LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2015
  4. Burg v. HornDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1965
  5. Harhen v. BrownMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1999

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API