Legal Opinion
Credico v. Department of Homeland Security
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 11, 2016No. Civil Action No. 2015-1127PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
RANDOLPH D. MOSS, United States District Judge
Plaintiff Justin Credico, a pro se prisoner, brings this, action under the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) against Defendant Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”), seeking to compel a response to his FOIA request. In lieu of answering, DHS filed a motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment, explaining that it never received Plaintiffs FOIA request and that, accordingly, Plaintiff failed to exhaust his administrative remedies. The Court then discovered that there was reason to believe Plaintiff…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. KrasSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- M. L. B. v. S. L. J.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Ortwein v. SchwabSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Ortwein v. SchwabSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Blair-Bey v. QuickCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Matthews v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Choon's Design, LLC v. ContextLogic, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2020
- Geddis v. Department of Homeland SecurityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024
- Matthews v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017